24-Jan-06 11:00 AM CST
Non-surgical Hair Replacement versus Follicular Unit Transplantation
Non-surgical hair replacement encompasses the employment of hair extensions and wigs to cover the areas of hair loss. The advantages of their use include little pain or discomfort, as much density as desired, not limited by donor availability, and non-invasive application. It is the only available option for patients with active scarring alopecia, and alopecia areata, including alopecia totalis and universalis and anagen effluvium secondary to both chemotherapy and radiation therapy.
The main disadvantages are unnatural appearance, requirement of maintenance and
limitations of active live styles. The main problem is usually an unnatural hairline. The hairline problem is made worst with wind turbulence, which tends to want to lift the hairpiece. Wind and water are usually unwelcome because they usually expose the system’s base or matrix. Their use also requires a commitment to a regular maintenance schedule. As the patient’s hair grows, both a system that is attached and the hair extension will get loose and start to gain movement.
Follicular unit transplantation offers the most natural results because this is what occurs naturally in the scalp. It restores your hairline, with your own natural hair, so it requires no special maintenance, it is totally natural. The wind and water pose little concern, since it is your own hair; there is nothing to hide.
Occasionally, a patient committed to a hair system will desire the restoration of the hairline with follicular unit transplantation. This makes much sense when donor is in limited supply and the patient desires maximal density. The patient gains a natural hairline and gains coverage of the remaining alopecic areas with the hair systems.
Master hair system specialists can be of great assistance in transitioning patients undergoing surgical hair restoration out of their hair systems through employing progressively smaller systems as their natural hair grows in. For those that do not belief that bald is beautiful, surgical follicular unit transplantation offers very natural results.
Nonsurgical hair replacement is an option for the donor challenged or those who are afflicted with receptive site dominant skin disorders, such as scarring alopecias and alopecia areata, and of course those that do not wish to undergo an invasive procedure.
Interested in learning more? Contact Arocha Hair Restoration to setup your personal Hair Replacement Consultation.
Rating: 5.00 / 5.00
-
1 ratings
For additional information on this Hair Restoration article, please contact:
Bernard Arocha
(713) 526-HAIR
Related Documents:
Content Tags: hair restoration • non-surgical hair replacement vs. follicular unit transplantation
Other Recent Articles:
- Which is better FUE or FUT? 22-Dec-11
- More Happy Patients Tell Their Stories 2-Nov-11
- Advice on How Women can Slow the Shedding 28-Oct-11
- An Update on Hair "Cloning" Predictions 7-Oct-11
- Top 10 Articles About Artistic Hair Restoration in September 2011 3-Oct-11
- Pattern Hair Loss Among Women: Hair Restoration Can Help 30-Sep-11
- More Patient Testimonials Offer Feedback and Advice 28-Sep-11
- How Young is Too Young for Hair Restoration? 8-Sep-11
- Top 10 Artistic Hair Restoration Articles from August 2011 2-Sep-11
- Wayne Rooney's Bold Story Turning Heads 31-Aug-11
Return to Houston Hair Transplant, Houston Hair Restoration Articles Search
Hair Restoration Services
- Corrective Hair Restoration
- Corrective Transplant Surgery
- Eyebrow Reconstruction
- Eyelash Reconstruction
- Facial Hair Transplant Video
Dr. Arocha's Upcoming Events
No Upcoming Events found. Check back soon!
Dr. Arocha's Featured Articles
Which is better FUE or FUT?
Which is better FUE or FUT? There are advantages to both techniques as there are some disadvantages to each. Each technique is worthwhile having in the armamentarium to battle hair loss and for a complete approach to state of the art hair restoration. Remember that no matter which donor harvesting more





